Search for: "Doe v. Doe, No. 125" Results 1 - 20 of 1,302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Harvard Law Review, 125: 6 (2012)
24 Apr 2012, 8:51 am by Harvard Law Review
— Muniz v. [read post]
Concurring Opinions - http://www.concurringopinions.com
10-1433 U.S. v. Spagnola 
21 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
Bev Butula's Blog - http://www.wislawjournal.com/type.cfm/Bev%20Butula
Summary 2008 WY 125
10 Oct 2008, 10:32 am
Div. v. [read post]
Law Library Letter - http://wyolawlibrary.blogspot.com/
Roe v. Wade y Doe v. Bolton - fallos completos
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am by Gustavo Arballo
Páginas 124-125. [read post]
Saber Leyes No Es Saber Derecho - http://www.saberderecho.com/
Muehler v. Mena does not permit a law enforcement officer to extend a stop to ask questions of a passenger.
2 Jun 2008, 4:59 am
Ed. 2d 299, 125 S. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
OPINION: Davis v. Hall, et al.
13 Jun 2012, 7:37 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0746, 2012 MT 125, NIGEL and JAMI DAVIS, husband and wife, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. [read post]
State Law Library of Montana - http://mtlawlibrary.wordpress.com
How binding is a s.125 notice?
22 May 2010, 6:12 am by NL
Nessa v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2010] EWCA Civ 559 This is an interesting appeal on the issue of the amendment or replacement of a S.125 Housing Act 1985 notice offering the right to buy at a specified price. [read post]
nearlylegal - http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog
How binding is a s.125 notice?
22 May 2010, 6:12 am by NL
Nessa v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2010] EWCA Civ 559 This is an interesting appeal on the issue of the amendment or replacement of a S.125 Housing Act 1985 notice offering the right to buy at a specified price. [read post]
nearlylegal - http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog
On Hughes v. Doe and unpublished opinions
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
Doe involves almost precisely the same issue as what was before the Court in a case I had years ago and lost 7-0, in an unpublished opinion, whereas Doe only lost 5-2. [read post]
SW Virginia law blog - http://swvalaw.blogspot.com/
Copyright Board Does Not Want to Hear from Commissioner of Competition At This Stage re Access Copyright
17 Jun 2011, 2:48 pm by Howard Knopf
" [Bell Canada v. [read post]
Excess Copyright - http://excesscopyright.blogspot.com/
Did Marcum establish an additional element in an Article 125 consensual sodomy case?
19 Feb 2009, 2:39 pm
Is Article 125, Sodomy a Dead Letter in Light of Lawrence v. [read post]
CAAFlog - http://caaflog.blogspot.com/
Harvard Law Review, 125:2 (2011)
20 Dec 2011, 10:47 am by Harvard Law Review
— Doe VIII v. [read post]
Concurring Opinions - http://www.concurringopinions.com
NJ U-Turn Law Traffic Offense Court Ruling
15 Aug 2009, 9:04 am
The Appellate Division decision in State v. [read post]
Essex County NJ Criminal Attorney - http://essexcountynjcriminalattorneys.wordpress.com
How Does Parenting Time Affect Child Support In Illinois?
27 Nov 2022, 12:38 pm by Russell Knight
” Blisset v. [read post]
Law Offices of Russell D. Knight - https://rdklegal.com/blog/
A Tenancy Without a Written Lease: What Does a Tenant Possess and How Much Does He/She Pay?
14 Aug 2015, 4:57 am by Thomas Major, Esq.
Leff, 125 N.J. [read post]
New York & New Jersey Consumer Law Blog - http://www.nynjconsumerlaw.com
A Tenancy Without a Written Lease: What Does a Tenant Possess and How Much Does He/She Pay?
14 Aug 2015, 4:57 am by Thomas Major, Esq.
Leff, 125 N.J. [read post]
New York & New Jersey Consumer Law Blog - http://www.nynjconsumerlaw.com
Supreme Court of Canada on Copyright: “Copyright Law Does Not Exist Solely for the Benefit of Authors”
20 Jul 2022, 6:43 am by Michael Geist
It states:Copyright law does not exist solely for the benefit of authors: York University v. [read post]
Michael Geist's Blog - http://www.michaelgeist.ca
DOMA Stricken Down: What does this Mean for Texas Employers?
15 Sep 2013, 7:20 am by Michael Kelsheimer
While the ruling in Windsor v. [read post]
Texas Employer Handbook - http://www.texasemployerhandbook.com/
Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal ... as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
30 May 2018, 4:37 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
United States v. Wilson
25 Feb 2008, 2:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
CAAFlog - http://caaflog.blogspot.com/